My photo
Yrisarri, NM, United States
Inside every old person is a young person asking what in the hell happened!

Wednesday, October 10, 2018

American Leadership

Get put of my way
You morons
Get out of my way
So I can lead you
I know the way to go
You're just milling around
I know what to do,
How to stop,
How to start, 
How to finish the things 
that need to be done
for you fools
who have no idea
how to do anything for yourselves
except wait for your sustenance
to arrive in the mail so 
you can party away my
hard earned money.
I will lead you away 
from your transgressions
against me and make you 
just like me, good and pure,
knowing what to do, and
how to fulfill your life.
Then the world will be a better
place, once we’re all the same.

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Myths are Stories


“.....two fundamental realizations--of the inevitability of eventual death and the endurance of the social order have been combined symbolically and constitute the nuclear structuring force of the rites and, thereby, the society.” 
Joseph Campbell

Myths are powerful stories that give meaning to individual lives and shape the civilizations they inhabit.  The many functions of myths provide the narrative for individual lives and bring us together to share tragedy and create societal order. A myth, however, only retains its power by telling and retelling it’s stories and helps to shape and organize individuals into cultural and political groups. 

There are many ways to tell these stories.  In American Gods Neil Gaiman uses the metaphor of worship to explain why the old Gods are losing their power. Worship is another form of storytelling. No matter the form of the story, if the stories are not told they begin to lose their power and the functions they provide to individuals and society are replaced by new myths whose stories become accepted through the cycle of telling and retelling. 

The Nile River

The Egyptian myth cycle clearly illustrates this dynamic.  As George Hart notes in Egyptian Myths, “Egyptian myths, though seemingly outlandish to some, have survived because the society out of which they originated considered them crucial to the creation of a  view of the world. Scribes, priests and story-tellers transmitted myths to explain etiological phenomena, to provide data for the continuity of existence in the afterlife and to exhibit the versatility of their imaginations. So whether as part of a religious quest of anthropological investigation or whether for an adventure into the surreal, the myths and legends of ancient Egypt leave us richer for their speculation and imagery.” 

The harsh realty of the Egypt's geography provided the material for its stories. A narrow river valley surrounded by bleak deserts and the punishing sun beating down each day was the genesis for Egyptian myths. As in all societies, there was a need for each individual to understand the meaning of their life and what happened upon death and there was a need to organize a society that could survive the harsh environment they had been given. The river Nile overflowing its banks and providing the rich silt which nourished the earth and gave rise to agriculture was proof of resurrection. Individuals had to work together to exist and insure that the cycle of life continued from year to year. 

This brutal reality gave rise to many Gods and stories of creation, resurrection and survival in the villages up and down the length of the Nile river. Jules Cashford elegantly explains this concept, “The ancient Egyptians explored these questions in the context of the overwhelming reality of their daily lives: the annual rising and falling of the River Nile, on which their life depended. The land of Egypt is re-created every year by this river which flows from south to north, from the equator to the Mediterranean,  Life was--and still is contained in a narrow valley on either side of the river.  Beyond this lies desert, a barren land of sand and rock with no water and no shade from the burning sun.”

These stories began to consolidate as villages became city-states while leaders learned the power of the Gods to keep society functioning. The rites of worship and ways of life were forms of the stories needed to to create society and cultures. Significantly, the rulers began to transcribe the stories in order to perpetuate their power. 

In Egypt these stories were transcribed on what is known as the Pyramid Texts.  In Egyptian Myths George Hart explains that these texts are, “Columns of hieroglyphs were carved 4,300 years ago in the vestibule and sarcophagus hall of the pyramid of King Wenis (c2350 BC) at Sakkara, necropolis of the royal capital of Memphis, with the intention of seeking a hereafter for the monarch in the vicinity of the sun god. Subsequent rulers of the old Kingdom (c2649-2152 BC continued this tradition. Known as Pyramid Texts, this corpus of spells and speculations gives us the opportunity to evaluate the complex imagery centered upon the Egyptian pantheon,. It also forms the earliest religious compilations in the world. “


The pyramid texts were the precursors to a civilization rich in written stories, oral storytelling, rites of worship and a pantheon of Gods to support the many functions that myths provide. The four basic functions of myth were prevalent in the stories of the Gods. The creation myths supported the awe and explanation of the universe as seen from the perspective of the narrow river valley in which they lived. Gods such as Ra, Osiris and Anubis gave shape to the social order of the great civilizations that rose under the relentless heat of the rising and setting sun transversing their river valley. The story of Isis and Osiris gave instructions about how to be human in an ever expanding empire beset with outside attacks and the cruelty of nature.

As the city-states combined and a strong nation developed, encompassing the land from Sudan to the Mediterranean Sea, the Gods too consolidated and their stories were told in ever increasing ways. Other forms of storytelling beside the pyramid texts were the Coffin Texts, the Bremner-Rhind Papyrus and the "Shabaka Stone" .  The latter contains the story of the accession of the god Horus to the throne of Egypt and the Memphite myth of the creator god. These stories were preserved by King Shabaka (712-698 BC) who discovered the papyrus scrolls on which they were inscribed was being eaten by worms. Evidence for Amun as the creator is found on Papyrus Leiden. 

There are also stories inscribed into statues and buildings perpetuating the mythic stories. Temples in Luxor contain stories of Amun and his sexual union fathering the future monarch of Egypt and temple decorations at Esna and Edu that also record accounts of creation. 

It is clear that the preservation of the stories was important to the rulers of Egypt. They understood the power of myth and in particular the organizing capabilities of the stories. In 1984 Mary Boyce reported on the research of Berger and Luckmann linking social construction, story and organization and determined that story can be a vehicle for social control. The wide spread telling and preservation in ancient Egypt would indicate that the Pharaohs and men of power understood exactly how to create a political state using myth.

The most enduring myth of Egypt is that of Osiris. He underwent several changes over the years as his importance waned and waxed.  His stories served many functions for ancient Egyptians. He was a legendary king who brought civilization to his people, showed them how to cultivate crops, taught people how to worship the gods, is associated with the afterlife, fertility, and resurrection and serves as a dynastic myth. He had a long and useful life in ancient Egypt as long as his story was told.

This myth, as Cashford explains, was not extant in a full epic version but had be pieced together from several ancient and classical sources: The pyramid texts of the old kingdom, the coffin texts of the middle kingdom, the Book of the Dead from the new kingdom, a ribald text entitled the Contest of Horus and from the twentieth dynasty and the summary of Plutarch in Concerning Isis and Osiris from the second century AD. 

The stories of Osiris are illustrative of the power of myth in relation to the telling of the stories. Plutarch saved Osiris by searching for his story and finding it at the festival of Abydos a yearly event following the inundation of the Nile. It was not until 1882 and the discovery of the Rosetta Stone that the stories of Osiris and other Egyptian myths became available to the modern world. 

The resurgence of these stories in today’s world is an indicator of the power of the stories they tell. Although their power has not reach the level of organizing society, they are multifunctional and appealing to the individual who is wondering what life is all about.


Works Cited

Boyce, Mary E., Organizational Story and Storytelling: A Critical Review, University of
Redlands, California, 1996, Web, 13 Sept. 2010.

Campbell, Joseph, Myths To Live By, Penguin Group, New York, 1972, Print.

Cashford, Jules, The Myth of Isis and Osiris, Barefoot Books, Boston, 1993, Print.

Gaiman, Neil, American Gods, Harpertorch, New York, 2001, Print.

Hart, George, Egyptian Myths, British Museum Publications University of Texas Press, Austin,
1990, Print. 

Reid, Patrick V., ed., Readings In Western Religious Thought: The Ancient World, Paulist
Press, New Jersey, 1987, Print.


Friday, October 5, 2018

Everyone Wants to be Rich


The impoverished Of America 
are not just those lacking money,
but include those with
poverty of the imagination.

In a war on the new other
house after house 
and building after building
has been abandoned
rural areas are armed and
inner cities are battle zones

beauty is lost.

We have A disaster like no other
For In our quest for gold
We have obliterated distinctions
The land of individual liberty
Has destroyed our differences.

To create identical things
with replaceable workers 
who go home 
on our pocked streets
bloated with cars 
that all look the same 
staying within the lines looking  for
gas stations, restaurants and motels 
made out of ticky tacky.

Screens with 
with hundreds of channels, 
are unable to show us 
anything to help 
build Our dreams 
instead they manipulate us
to be a part of the collective.
slaves to the whims of those who
control all so that they can live like kings
and we their modern vassals.


Tuesday, October 2, 2018

Education and Politics

I keep hearing politicians in New Mexico talk about a need for vocational training and the limitations of a college education. One candidate even spoke about universities restricting the majors that are available based upon the ability to pay high enough wages to pay back their loans.  There was an indication that vocational education would cut costs for universities.

These are certainly wrong headed notions about the purpose of universities and the cost of vocational training. All majors can produce enough money to pay back student loans. No one needs to start at the top of a pay scale. They are also wrong headed notions about freedom of choice.  Each person needs to learn to create their own plan for their future, not fulfill somebody else's plan.

What we need to do for education is stop preparing children for college or work. We need to prepare them for life. How to establish relationships and how to manage a household. People should know how machines and things like water systems work. In this way they will learn what they need to know for their future, not the society's past.

To accomplish this, mandatory education should be complete after 10 years of schooling. Students should know enough academic skills at this point to choose a direction to explore. Secondary education should allow them to explore the world of work and academia to learn what is possible and make choices about their future that suits their needs.

The best thing politicians can do is promise to fund an education system that allows for personal growth and development, not one that fits children into boxes and determine their future. Margaret Mead once famously said, "children learn what they need to know for the future." Let us accommodate that idea, not one that determines their future


Wednesday, September 26, 2018

What did we learn in school? Socialism

I know the textbook I used as a teacher of World History included a section on different economic theories. We compared communism, capitalism, socialism. We talked about who owned the means of production and why that mattered. We also discussed the various governmental philosophies. So why do people not understand these basic concepts today?

I was following a thread about socialism and one of the participants was dead set against socialism because of Jamestown, "and we all know how that ended", he wrote. First of all, Jamestown was a corporate charter exploratory colony and I would say that the outcome was ok. I smoked cigarettes, the outcome of that colony, for many years. Other comments on that thread and others I have read demonstrated a misunderstanding of the terms.

Socialism advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange of goods should be controlled or owned by the community as a whole.  Whereas, communism as espoused by Marx is achieved by class war, eventually all property is publicly owned, and each person is paid according to their abilities and needs. In a capitalist system the means of production, distribution and exchange are owned by private entities to make a profit. I would add here that today, the capitalists are well on their way to own and control the government.


Another ism that gets bandied about quite bit is fascism and nazis. I am including the definition for that because I believe it too is misunderstood.  Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one national or ethnic group, a contempt for democracy, an insistence on obedience to a powerful leader. who controls the economy, and a strong demagogic approach. Some think that this is the turn the U.S. economy and government are taking.



Communism and socialism were 19th century responses to capitalist overreach. The robber barons set the mode of operation for the capitalist system. That was to disregard the needs of the workers and the workings of nature. The expectations of early capitalists for their labor force seemed to have been based upon the feudal system and some form of forced labor, such as slavery or indentured servitude. They have built their wealth using the nation's resources while disregarding the beauty and functions of the earth. Clean air and water are not the price we should have to pay for capitalists to create their wealth.

Communism and socialism have been demonized by capitalists because their ability to create as much wealth as they desire would be curtailed. If corporations have to pay the total cost of doing business their overhead would be much higher, less profit. Cooperative economic systems want their taxes to go for building and maintaining infrastructure, including schools, public spaces and services. That would mean that the capitalists would have to pay to clean up the toxic waste some of their businesses leave behind. They would have to pay their workers at least enough that anyone working would not need to use public welfare services, like food stamps. 


The capitalist system has painted all systems of government, control, and economic development as either good or bad, but just like all of life, it's systems are nuanced. Each government exists somewhere on a spectrum of each of the economic and governmental organization. The United States uses some of it's tax money to build roads, bridges and assist in the overall transportation systems of the country. Helping those in need is another example of using our resources to give a lift to those who need it. The pentagon is funded to protect us and the workers in that system live in a socialist economy where their food, housing and other benefits are subsidized or provided.


Economics is concerned with studying and influencing the economy. Politics is the theory and practice of influencing people through the exercise of power, e.g. governments, elections and political parties. These two systems  work together and often are conflated. Socialism and communism appear to us as bad systems because they have been adopted by authoritarian leaders. In essence those leaders make great promise to the average working man, making them easy to manipulate and use to gain power. Just because communism was used by Stalin in a brutal manner does not mean a more enlightened country with democratic principles can't benefit from the system. Likewise, Putin uses democracy as a tool to rule today's Russia and that does not mean the people of Russia have the same freedoms as people in the United States. 

The promise of socialism and communism is the use of cooperation versus individual enterprise. Individual enterprise allows the greedy to rise to the top while cooperation appears to them to deaden the roots of ambition. If the past is any guide these two principles will be blended to create a better world. Just as feudalism and mercantilism set the stage for capitalism, communism and socialism have set the stage to give the working man and woman the dignity individual enterprise has denied them.





Saturday, September 15, 2018

Things That Divide Us-Pro-Choice/Life

This divisive topic pits life against death. What could be more inflammatory? I think this is the heart of the pro-life narrative. Most people would choose life if that is the choice. However, there are competing narratives that do use such stirring language. I would argue that the more nuanced narratives have less emotional appeal and are not heard the same way.

How do you pack the same punch into the argument that "they do it anyway". How can that be framed to compete with "life vs death". It seems to me that argument is a more understanding reason and deserves more thought. As long as families and society are intolerant of "unwanted pregnancies" that is exactly what will happen. The woman who has sperm and eggs uniting inside her will feel rejected and if the child is born, there is a chance it may feel the same.

A number of woman make the choice to abort the pregnancy. They are not killing a child, they are stopping a pregnancy.  So, in a sense, the narrative becomes "stopping a pregnancy or allowing it to continue".  At that point the argument becomes softer, less stark. In addition, many people feel that life begins when egg is fertilized. That, however is not the only thought on when life begins.

From an evolutionary point of view it is the purpose of human beings is to reproduce themselves. This is true for all types of life.  We are biologically capable of reproducing prolifically. Men have unlimited sperm and women unlimited eggs during their reproductive cycles.  If a sperm does not make it to an egg nothing is lost because there are so many sperm that one will surely make it eventually. If not right now, probably later.  Sometimes the egg and sperm create a zygote that does not make it. No worries it can happen later. My point is that there are numerous opportunities to create life and if that process is aborted nature/creator/God has provided for that possibility.

Does life begin with conception, or when the heart beats begin, or as many maintain, when the first breath is taken? This question has been debated for ages and there is no consensus.  Judaism Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism and other religious and cultural groups have differing ideas about when life begins. The stance of the pro-life supporters, that life begins at conception, is a minority view. They have taken the science of life beyond the ideas of scientists, who do not all agree that the beginning is at conception.

Wherever life begins, it is access to a woman's body that is being debated. It would appear that those who abhor a "nanny" government have no compunction about controlling what a woman can or can not do with her body. The patriarchy inherent in societies around the world have believed for centuries that it is a male right to control their women.

Over time women have asserted their rights as individuals who not only control their own lives, but also their say in public debate and governance. This has been a difficult war in which the right to birth control and the final say over their pregnancy has been fought battle by battle. Pro-choice adherents believe they are the only ones who should have access to what happens to their bodies, while pro-life supporters believe the government has the right to decide what happens to a woman's body.

Male control over women has weakened and they can no longer dictate what happens to a woman. It is my belief that most women desire a rational dialogue with their partners about ending a pregnancy, but believe the final choice is theirs to make.

Certainly it is noble and idealistic to wish that all pregnancies be carried to to birth. That should be the goal not a dictum. I think many humans agree that abortion should not be used as birth control. However, the most important ingredient to living a fulfilling life is love. Every child should be loved, valued, and nourished before they are conceived. That is how we end unwanted pregnancies.


Thursday, August 16, 2018

Responsible Ownership of Weapons

It is amazing how our debate about the ownership of rifles and guns has devolved into such a heated partisan issue.  The weapon manufacturers have been working hard to arm everyone in the name of profits.  The moral issue of responsible ownership has become lost in the calls for "gun" control.  The most ludicrous part of the arguments is the fear of those who are not responsible owner of weapons causes the call for unregulated ownership of those same weapons.

The second amendment with its indirect language has provided fuel for both sides.  It reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." During the discussions after the Parkland shootings a representative of the NRA was defending their position on this topic and stated that all gun owners are the militia.  

I like this idea.  It makes the language clearer.  Gun owners belong to a "well regulated" militia to help provide security for a free state.  It is my opinion this gives the state the right to provide laws for responsible ownership.